Smith + Malek
contact@smithmalek.com (208) 473-7009 (509) 606-1500
×
  • Our Firm
    • Careers
  • Team
  • Practice Areas
    • General Counsel
      • Contract Law
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Human Resources Law
    • Corporate Litigation
      • Appellate Law
    • Healthcare Law
    • Mining Law Attorneys
  • Blog
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
Real Estate Law

How Breaches of Contract in Real Estate are Handled in Idaho

Sep 24, 2021

If you buy or sell real property in Idaho, it is important to know what might happen if either party breaches the contract during the transaction. Breaches of real estate contracts are handled differently than other types of contract breaches.

Rather than ask for money, the injured party may seek specific performance, which is court-ordered. Specific performance means that the parties will be required to proceed with the sale of the property under the terms of the contract. 

In Idaho, the right of specific performance is typically available to the aggrieved party. The court will assume that money damages will be inadequate to resolve the dispute because of the uniqueness of land. 

Schedule a Consultation

There are exceptions to this general rule in Idaho. A court will only grant specific performance if an award of money is not adequate, plain, speedy, and complete. The court may also decline specific performance if a party cannot show it needs the real property for a unique and particular purpose. For example, if a party is purchasing real property with the intent to resell it for a profit, the court may find that specific performance is unnecessary because money damages will be a sufficient remedy. 

If you need assistance navigating a real estate contract breach, we have attorneys who specialize in the practice areas of business and real estate. Please contact our office to learn more.

This blog post is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. This blog does not provide legal advice. This blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Smith + Malek, PLLC. If you want to create an attorney-client relationship and have specific questions regarding the application of the law to your own circumstances, you should contact our office.

 

  1. See Suchan v. Rutherford, 90 Idaho 288, 295, 410 P.2d 434, 438 (1966).
  2. See Suchan, 90 Idaho at 295, 410 P.2d at 438.
  3. Suchan, 90 Idaho at 295, 410 P.2d at 438.
  4. Watkins v. Paul, 95 Idaho 499, 501, 511 P.2d 78, 783 (1973).
  5.  Watkins, 95 Idaho at 501, 511 P.2d at 783.
Topics Covered Here

Related Articles

Legal Considerations When Buying Commercial Property

Many commercial investors are flocking to Idaho because of its rapid population growth, thriving economy, and business-friendly environment. Buying commercial property in Idaho is a significant financial decision, whether...

Read more
A Closer Look at HOA Transfer Fees in Idaho

Transfer fees are now a key issue in real estate, especially for homes within a homeowner’s association (HOA). In Idaho, HOA transfer fees come with specific guidelines, and understanding...

Read more
Romance and Real Estate – Buyers Beware

Purchasing a home with a partner outside of marriage may seem like the ultimate demonstration of your commitment, but there are legal and financial risks that make it a...

Read more

Ready to work with us?

We are committed to keeping you up to date on legal matters that may impact you. We send 1-2 informative emails per month.
Consent: By hitting submit, you understand that we do not become your attorneys. That only happens if we both agree to the consult.(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Our Firm
  • Our Team
  • Careers
  • Our Blog
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Smith + Malek. All Rights Reserved.

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

Notifications